Skip to main content

State v. Fridley

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 4368
  • 93 N.E.3d 10

Syllabus

Trial court did not err by denying appellant's motion to suppress evidence tending to prove appellant's intoxication, including the results of a Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) test and two blood draws. In addition, appellant was not entitled to the suppress of incriminating statements made to police prior to arrest where appellant was not subject to custodial interrogation, which would have triggered the need for Miranda warnings.

Judges: Ringland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.