State v. French
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 1256
Syllabus
ASSAULT — SELF-DEFENSE — MANIFEST WEIGHT — ABUSE OF DISCRETION — IMPEACHMENT — EVID.R. 609: Where defendant's honest belief of imminent bodily harm was not objectively reasonable, the trial court did not lose its way and create a manifest miscarriage of justice with respect to its finding that the state had disproven at least one element of self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt. Where defendant's counsel did not actually impeach the state's witness regarding a prior criminal conviction under Evid.R. 609 and agreed to move on after the trial court struck the witness's testimony regarding the prior conviction, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding evidence of the witness's prior criminal conviction.
Judges: Kinsley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-07-25· cited 4×
- State v. RossOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-08-16· cited 4×
- State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-06-06· cited 1×
- State v. MilesOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-11-07· cited 1×
- State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-12-04· cited 1×
- State v. MosesOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-12-11
- Cleveland v. TomeOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-06-04
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.