State v. Freitag-Shaw

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• expert opinion that injuries “most likely” result of abuse expressed in terms of reasonable medical probability
• court did not err in applying preponderance standard to determine that husband had sexually abused his daughter, and such evidence supported the restriction of his visitation
• \the assumption and exercise of control over the offending area or instrumentality is deemed to be in the independent contractor\
• \the assumption and exercise of control over the offending area or instrumentality is deemed to be in the independent contractor\
• trial court did not abuse discretion in holding defendant in contempt for not making child support payments on grounds of inability to pay where defendant did not seek modification of support order until after plaintiff instituted contempt proceedings
• fair preponderance is “the ordinary civil standard of proof”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).