State v. Freeman
Citations
- 2024 ND 66
Syllabus
A motion for mistrial is reviewed for an abuse of discretion or a manifest injustice would result. Granting a mistrial is an extreme remedy and should only be resorted to when a fundamental defect or occurrence in the trial proceedings exists that makes it evident that further proceedings would be productive of manifest injustice. Trial courts have wide discretion over the conduct of trial and the courtroom. A trial court does not abuse its discretion by granting a recess when jurors are ill or have other such emergencies. A criminal judgment entered after a jury found the defendant guilty of murder is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
Judges: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Jeffrey ThomasEighth Circuit· 2006-06-28· cited 25×
- State v. RaiNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-03-13· cited 20×
- State v. StevensNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1909-12-07· cited 15×
- State v. ThomasNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-07-11· cited 10×
- State v. KnightNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-07-19· cited 5×
- State v. HeinrichNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-05-30· cited 3×
- United States v. Doyle HorneEighth Circuit· 1985-02-28· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.