State v. Freeman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statute giving the State extra 30 days to file a motion to revoke probation was substantive because if applied, it altered the length of the defendant's probation
• holding a statute allowing the State a 30-day grace period to file a motion to revoke probation was substantive because, if applied, it would have changed the length of the defendant's punishment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lumley
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1999-04-16· cited 47×
• State v. Hayden
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2015-12-18· cited 17×
• State v. Dreier
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-11-21· cited 9×
• State v. White
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2015-10-30· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Adee
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1987-07-17· cited 87×
• State v. Sutherland
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1991-01-18· cited 69×
• State v. Hutchison
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1980-07-18· cited 65×
• State v. Holland
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1985-03-02· cited 11×