State v. Freeman
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 4973
Syllabus
SENTENCING – MANDATORY FINE – INDIGENCY – R.C. 2929.19: The trial court did not err in imposing a mandatory fine where defendant filed an affidavit of indigency that established he was currently unable to pay the fine, the record supported a finding that defendant would have the future ability to pay the fine, and the trial court considered defendant's present and future ability to pay the fine as required by R.C. 2929.19(B)(5).
Judges: Zayas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. MaloneOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-21· cited 8×
- State v. McCantsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-24· cited 7×
- State v. RisterOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-04-18· cited 6×
- State v. DwyerOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-02-18· cited 5×
- State v. StrangeOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-02-17· cited 3×
- State v. GibsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-04-07· cited 3×
- State v. WaltonOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-12-20· cited 2×
- State v. ReedOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-08-18
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. GipsonOhio Supreme Court· 1998-01-07· cited 186×
- State v. FicklinOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-07-11· cited 11×
- State v. CollierOhio Court of Appeals· 2009-09-08· cited 10×
- State v. StidhumOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-11-16· cited 8×
- State v. OwensOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-05-11· cited 5×
- State v. CampbellOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-07-15· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.