Skip to main content

State v. Freeman

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 4973

Syllabus

SENTENCING – MANDATORY FINE – INDIGENCY – R.C. 2929.19: The trial court did not err in imposing a mandatory fine where defendant filed an affidavit of indigency that established he was currently unable to pay the fine, the record supported a finding that defendant would have the future ability to pay the fine, and the trial court considered defendant's present and future ability to pay the fine as required by R.C. 2929.19(B)(5).

Judges: Zayas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.