New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 9/16/1999
State v. Freeman
Citations
- 735 A.2d 1195
- 324 N.J. Super. 463
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting prosecutor’s charging discretion and consent are relevant to whether unindicted charge may be submitted to jury when defendant’s proposed lesser-offense charge is neither an included offense nor one “embraced” by indictment
- noting prosecutor's charging discretion and consent are relevant to whether unindicted charge may be submitted to jury when defendant's proposed lesser-offense charge is neither an included offense nor one \embraced\ by indictment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Keefe and Carchman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Osborne S. Maloney (068877)Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2013-10-16· cited 74×
- State v. PenaSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2004-01-26· cited 28×
- State v. MerolaNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2002-03-15· cited 28×
- State v. EcholsNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2008-02-26· cited 5×
- State v. RobersonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2002-08-12
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1990-05-17· cited 222×
- State v. PurnellSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1992-01-15· cited 99×
- State v. SloaneSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1988-07-26· cited 78×
- State v. TalleySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1983-10-17· cited 66×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1994-06-20· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.