Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 9/30/1996

State v. Freeman

Citations

943 S.W.2d 25
1996 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 606

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that factor did not apply when defendant was charged and convicted of separate convictions for each victim
holding that trial court erred in applying enhancement factor that defendant was leader in the commission of the offense because there was no evidence that defendant planned the encounter with the victim or that he requested or prompted others to participate
holding that trial court erred in applying enhancement factor that defendant was leader in the commission of the offense because there was no evidence that defendant planned the encounter with the victim or that he requested or prompted others to participate
in holding that the trial court erred in applying this factor, this Court discussed that there was “no evidence in the record that the defendant somehow planned th[e] encounter” with the victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peay, Welles, Clark

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

73 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.