Court of Appeals of Washington· 3/26/2001

State v. Freeburg

Citations

105 Wash. App. 492
20 P.3d 984

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

limiting instruction can be crafted in such a way so as not comment on the evidence
“[E]vidence of resistance to arrest, concealment, assumption of a false name, and related conduct are admissible if they allow a reasonable inference of consciousness of guilt of the charged crime.”
intent to steal is a nonstatutory element of robbery in Washington
the trial court erred in admitting evidence that defendant was armed when arrested over two years after murder at issue occurred because the evidence was prejudicial and had little probative value, in part because the gun was not the one used in the murder
the trial court erred in admitting evidence that defendant was armed when arrested over two years after murder at issue occurred because the evidence was prejudicial and had little probative value, in part because the gun was not the one used in the murder
the trial court erred in admitting evidence that defendant was armed when arrested over two years after murder at issue occurred because the evidence was prejudicial and had little probative value, in part because the gun was not the one used in the murder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ellington

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Freeburg

9 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.