State v. Frankenfield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Application of a court rule to a specific set of facts is a question which this court reviews de novo.\ (citing State v. Ledenko, 87 Wash. App. 39, 42, 940 P.2d 280 (1997))
• “Application of a court rule to a specific set of facts is a question which this court reviews de novo.” (citing State v. Ledenko, 87 Wn. App. 39, 42, 940 P.2d 280 (1997))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Chavez-Romero
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2012-09-11· cited 19×
• State v. Osman
  Washington Supreme Court· 2010-03-25· cited 10×
• State v. Osman
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2008-12-22· cited 6×
• State v. Frankenfield
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-07-03
• State v. Frankenfield
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-06-10

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Greenwood
  Washington Supreme Court· 1993-02-04· cited 169×
• State v. Bernhard
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-10-06· cited 29×
• State v. Barton
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1981-03-23· cited 29×
• State v. Ledenko
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-07-17· cited 21×
• City of Kennewick v. Vandergriff
  Washington Supreme Court· 1987-10-01· cited 14×
• State v. Fulps
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-09-21· cited 12×

Other cases named State v. Frankenfield

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• State v. Frankenfield
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-07-03
• State v. Frankenfield
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-06-10
• State v. Frankenfield
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1990-04-02