Utah Supreme Court· 10/18/1985
State v. Fox
Citations
- 709 P.2d 316
- 1985 Utah LEXIS 927
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that co-occupancy of a house where marijuana was being grown, absent other evidence, was insufficient to establish a nexus
- holding that evidence that the defendant lived in a home where marijuana was being cultivated was insufficient to support a finding of constructive possession
- holding that a defendant did not have constructive possession when his connections to the residence containing the contraband were separable from the area where the contraband was found
- holding that a defendant did not have constructive possession when his connections to the residence containing the contraband were separable from the area where the contraband was found
- holding that a marijuana greenhouse located in an \openly accessible\ shared area of property was not sufficient to support constructive possession, absent additional evidence of intent to possess or control
- noting that the quantity of an illegal substance can be used as evidence of an intent to distribute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stewart, Durham, Zimmerman, Howe, Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Rivas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-08-23· cited 215×
- State v. AshcraftUtah Supreme Court· 2015-01-23· cited 53×
- State v. WattsUtah Supreme Court· 1988-02-17· cited 49×
- State v. HansenUtah Supreme Court· 1987-01-20· cited 43×
- State v. BriggsUtah Supreme Court· 2008-10-31· cited 36×
- State v. FairchildIdaho Court of Appeals· 1992-03-02· cited 35×
- State v. MundellHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1991-07-29· cited 29×
- State v. LaymanUtah Supreme Court· 1999-08-27· cited 28×
- State v. GarzaIdaho Court of Appeals· 1987-04-07· cited 25×
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-09-12· cited 24×
- State v. AyalaCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1988-10-14· cited 24×
- State v. SalasCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1991-11-04· cited 24×
- State v. HopkinsUtah Supreme Court· 1999-10-15· cited 22×
- State v. FischerSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2016-01-06· cited 18×
- State v. MonizHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1999-12-27· cited 16×
- State v. LaymanCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1998-01-29· cited 15×
- Spanish Fork City v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1999-03-04· cited 14×
- State v. VighCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1994-03-15· cited 13×
- State, in the Interest of MbCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2008-11-28· cited 10×
- State v. Gonzalez-CamargoCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2012-12-28· cited 10×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PetreeUtah Supreme Court· 1983-02-04· cited 148×
- United States v. JamesD.C. Circuit· 1974-02-04· cited 125×
- United States v. Joseph B. DavisD.C. Circuit· 1977-04-06· cited 99×
- State v. McCardellUtah Supreme Court· 1982-08-27· cited 96×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert RACKLEY, Randall T. Crosby, Defendants-AppellantsEleventh Circuit· 1984-02-13· cited 56×
- United States v. Gabriel Dejesus CardenasFifth Circuit· 1984-12-17· cited 54×
- United States v. Armando Garcia and Leonardo SorzanoFifth Circuit· 1981-09-04· cited 44×
- State v. AndertonUtah Supreme Court· 1983-08-15· cited 35×
- Pleasant v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 35×
- State v. CarlsonUtah Supreme Court· 1981-07-31· cited 20×
- Allen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1981-05-06· cited 18×
- State v. EchevarrietaUtah Supreme Court· 1980-12-04· cited 17×
- Herbert Charles Petley v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1970-06-05· cited 13×
- Leroy Walker, Jr. v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1974-01-16· cited 12×
- Jackson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1974-11-18· cited 7×
- Francis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1982-03-02· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.