Ohio Court of Appeals· 6/21/2021

State v. Foster

Citations

2021 Ohio 2063

Syllabus

Appellant's sentence was not clearly and convincingly contrary to law, where the trial court: (1) considered the purposes and principles of sentencing under R.C. 2929.11 and the seriousness and recidivism factors under R.C. 2929.12, (2) properly applied post-release control, and (3) imposed a sentence within the statutory range.

Judges: Duhart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

State v. Flowers
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-27· cited 3×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
State v. Kalish
Ohio Supreme Court· 2008-10-02· cited 1,234×
State v. Brimacombe
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-09-30· cited 96×
State v. Wilson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-10-12· cited 15×
State v. Parks
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-14· cited 12×
State v. Peck
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-04-18· cited 8×
State v. Hutchinson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-07-08· cited 4×
State v. Moore
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-03-22· cited 2×
State v. Boyer
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-28· cited 1×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.