State v. Foster

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “While the order may be an inconvenience, any interference with his parental rights is not substantial or beyond that which is justified by the need to protect the mother of his child. Foster cannot establish there is any infringement on his parental rights. . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State Of Washington v. Israel Allen Placencia Mcguire
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2020-01-28· cited 11×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Apprendi v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
• Blakely v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
• State v. Gunwall
  Washington Supreme Court· 1986-06-12· cited 1,052×
• City of Redmond v. Moore
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-06-03· cited 229×
• State v. Ancira
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-07-30· cited 93×
• Retired Public Employees Council v. Charles
  Washington Supreme Court· 2003-01-30· cited 77×
• State v. Marking
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-04-21· cited 31×
• State v. Schultz
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-04-23· cited 7×
• State v. Schultz
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-06-01· cited 5×