Indiana Court of Appeals· 6/10/2011
State v. Foster
Citations
- 950 N.E.2d 760
- 2011 Ind. App. LEXIS 1059
- 2011 WL 2304199
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding attenuation applicable to an Article 1, Section 11 challenge, but also acknowledging the Trotter court rejected the attenuation doctrine
- considering the attenuation doctrine in the context of a search and seizure claim under the Indiana Constitution and concluding it did not apply to the facts of that case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garrard, Najam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- David Wright v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2018-10-04· cited 25×
- Moise Joseph v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2012-10-02· cited 8×
- David Wright v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2018-01-24· cited 1×
- Robert Shorter v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2020-07-06
- Foster v. GigliSeventh Circuit· 2014-01-23
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Litchfield v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2005-03-24· cited 465×
- State v. QuirkIndiana Supreme Court· 2006-02-14· cited 131×
- Cox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-06-26· cited 62×
- Duran v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2010-06-30· cited 55×
- Trotter v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2010-09-10· cited 42×
- Barnes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2011-05-12· cited 28×
- Quinn v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-07-31· cited 26×
- Turner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-03-16· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.