Court of Appeals of Oregon· 6/5/1991
State v. Foster
Citations
- 812 P.2d 440
- 107 Or. App. 481
- 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 875
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- when the defendant was released on parole, his “term of imprisonment,” within the meaning of the Compact, ended
- “When [the] defendant was released on parole, the relevant term of imprisonment ended. Expiration of the 180 days did not occur ‘during the continuance of [that] term of imprisonment.’ ” (citation omitted)
- “when defendant was released on parole, the relevant term of imprisonment ended”
- “When [the] defendant was released on parole, the relevant term of imprisonment ended. Expiration of the 180 days did not occur ‘during the continuance of [that] term of imprisonment.’” (citation omitted)
- when defendant was released on parole, the relevant term of imprisonment ended
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Buttler, Rossman, De Muniz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Dunaway v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2001-11-21· cited 35×
- State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-08· cited 12×
- Cunningham v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2000-04-20· cited 9×
- Womble v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1997-03-19· cited 5×
- State v. FROHNHOFERNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2011-08-23· cited 4×
- Danielson v. MaassCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-09-29· cited 3×
- State v. FronhoferNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2011-08-23
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.