State v. Ford
Citations
- 76 Kan. 424
- 91 P. 1066
- 1907 Kan. LEXIS 281
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Intoxicating Liquors — Nuisance—Proof of Ownership — Circumstantial Evidence. In a prosecution upon a charge of keeping a place where intoxicating liquors were sold in violation of law, Where evidence has already been introduced tending to show that the defendant was in control of the premises in question, it is not error to permit the state to show that a number of bills for liquor and other goods found there at the time of the arrest, apparently relating to the business there carried on, were made out in his name, as a circumstance tending to show that he was the proprietor.</p>
Judges: Mason
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. JacobsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1890-10-23· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. JenningsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1871-09-15· cited 10×
- Reynolds v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-06-15· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. Certain Intoxicating LiquorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1877-01-03· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.