State v. Ford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, after the defendant consented to an officer’s search of a dresser drawer, the officer could seize methamphetamine pipe that officer observed in the drawer
• noting that an officer may only search a person's property pursuant to a person's consent until that person has \expressly revoked that consent\
• describing the consent exception to the warrant requirement as being “when the person consents to the search and has not expressly revoked that consent”
• discussing a person’s right to revoke consent that the person has given to a search

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Zamora
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-09-29· cited 5×
• State v. Newcomb
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-04-16· cited 5×
• State v. Brandes
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-02-24· cited 5×
• State v. Cowdrey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-02-22· cited 2×
• State v. Michel
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-07-16· cited 2×
• State v. Olendorff
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-12-10· cited 2×
• State v. Tate
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-11-24· cited 1×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
• Horton v. California
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 2,923×
• State v. Kennedy
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 519×
• State v. Bridewell
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-07-26· cited 131×
• State v. Affeld
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-11-16· cited 78×
• State v. Ready
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-05-28· cited 46×
• State v. Luers
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-02-14· cited 35×
• State v. Luers
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-06-13· cited 33×
• State v. Luther
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-05-11· cited 13×
• State v. Luther
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-11-15· cited 12×
• State v. Taxon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-07-31· cited 7×