Skip to main content

State v. Ford

Citations

  • 338 So. 2d 107

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the unavailability of an officer's complete testimony necessitated a new trial because it could not be determined whether the missing testimony was substantial or inconsequential
  • finding the unavailability of an officer’s complete testimony necessitated a new trial because it could not be determined whether the missing testimony was substantial or inconsequential
  • finding the unavailability of an officer’s complete testimony necessitated a new trial because it could not be determined whether the IflHiissing testimony was substantial or inconsequential
  • reversal required when record missing the testimony of four State witnesses and the voir dire of prospective jurors
  • reversal was required when the record was missing the testimony of four State witnesses and the voir dire of prospective jurors
  • reversal required when record missing the testimony of four state witnesses and the voir dire of prospective jurors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Calogero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

90 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.