Supreme Court of Louisiana· 10/6/1976
State v. Ford
Citations
- 338 So. 2d 107
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding the unavailability of an officer's complete testimony necessitated a new trial because it could not be determined whether the missing testimony was substantial or inconsequential
- finding the unavailability of an officer’s complete testimony necessitated a new trial because it could not be determined whether the missing testimony was substantial or inconsequential
- finding the unavailability of an officer’s complete testimony necessitated a new trial because it could not be determined whether the IflHiissing testimony was substantial or inconsequential
- reversal required when record missing the testimony of four State witnesses and the voir dire of prospective jurors
- reversal was required when the record was missing the testimony of four State witnesses and the voir dire of prospective jurors
- reversal required when record missing the testimony of four state witnesses and the voir dire of prospective jurors
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Calogero
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
90 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. CastleberrySupreme Court of Louisiana· 1999-04-13· cited 204×
- State v. DeruiseSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2001-04-03· cited 169×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1983-09-02· cited 161×
- State v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2000-04-11· cited 159×
- State v. TartSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1996-05-01· cited 157×
- State v. BridgewaterSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2002-06-21· cited 155×
- Peter James Schwander v. Frank Blackburn, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary and William J. Custe, Jr., Attorney General of the State of LouisianaFifth Circuit· 1985-01-17· cited 139×
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1996-09-05· cited 106×
- State v. BrumfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1998-10-20· cited 103×
- State v. LandrySupreme Court of Louisiana· 1999-06-29· cited 72×
- State v. LaCazeSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2002-01-25· cited 72×
- State v. FrankSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2001-04-04· cited 70×
- State v. VaughnSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1979-12-13· cited 62×
- State v. PinionSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2007-10-26· cited 59×
- State v. NeelyLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2008-12-16· cited 58×
- State v. CageSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1989-12-11· cited 55×
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1980-06-23· cited 50×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-05-01· cited 46×
- State v. BakerLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1991-05-30· cited 39×
- State v. StukesLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2009-09-09· cited 36×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-04-30· cited 20,800×
- Hardy v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1964-01-06· cited 335×
- Messenger v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 4Supreme Court· 1972-02-22· cited 77×
- United States v. Eddie UpshawFifth Circuit· 1971-09-03· cited 73×
- United States v. B. D. TaylorFourth Circuit· 1962-05-02· cited 56×
- State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1976-02-23· cited 54×
- Robert W. Fowler v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1962-11-21· cited 35×
- United States v. Jerome AtilusFifth Circuit· 1970-05-12· cited 29×
- State v. BiasSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1976-09-13· cited 19×
- State v. BizetteSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1976-06-21· cited 18×
- United States v. Hugo Garcia-BonifascioFifth Circuit· 1971-06-07· cited 14×
- Johnnie Glenn Herron v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1975-03-06· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.