State v. Forbes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that state statutes do not recognize a defense that payee knew of insufficient funds, and that intent to defraud is presumed if payment is not made to victim upon notice within a certain statutory timeframe

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Enos
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2011-06-17· cited 12×
• State v. Douglas J. Huntley
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2017-11-14· cited 3×
• Albertson v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-06-27· cited 3×
• State v. Lopes
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2005-10-24· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Caruolo
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1987-04-23· cited 112×
• State v. Henshaw
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1989-04-25· cited 69×
• State v. Dame
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1989-06-20· cited 63×
• State v. Grundy
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1990-11-21· cited 55×
• State v. Snow
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1996-02-05· cited 54×
• State v. Mercado
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1993-12-03· cited 41×
• State v. Scurry
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1994-02-01· cited 26×
• People v. Poyet
  California Supreme Court· 1972-01-26· cited 24×
• State v. Laperche
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1992-12-18· cited 10×
• State v. Halmi
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1995-03-09· cited 1×