State v. Fontenot

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no exigent circumstances in part because evidence sought contained in pill bottle in arrestee’s vaginal cavity; no danger of absorption or dissolution during delay in obtaining warrant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McGee v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-04-23· cited 463×
• State v. Clark
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1982-11-23· cited 43×
• Commonwealth v. Gilmore
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1998-05-06· cited 33×
• State v. Packard
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1980-10-06· cited 25×
• State v. Davis
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1995-12-15· cited 20×
• State v. Nicholas
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1995-03-03· cited 5×
• State v. Lussier
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-08-18· cited 3×
• Fuller v. Jewelry
  Ninth Circuit· 1991-12-11· cited 1×
• Laughter v. Kay
  D. Utah· 1997-10-29· cited 1×
• State v. Ferdinand
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1985-10-22
• State v. Bullock
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1995-09-15

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
• Schmerber v. California
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
• Johnson v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1948-02-02· cited 3,856×
• Bumper v. North Carolina
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 3,107×
• State v. Wood
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1972-06-05· cited 37×
• State v. Ahern
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1975-03-19· cited 33×
• State v. Winfrey
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1978-05-22· cited 22×
• Ferrara v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-10-10· cited 5×