State v. Fontana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• summarizing the civil and criminal cases determining that evidentiary privileges can be used as a shield but not a sword
• summarizing the civil and criminal cases determining that evidentiary privileges can be used as a shield but not a sword

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Dodis
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-01-15· cited 40×
• State v. Staat
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1971-11-12· cited 37×
• State v. Hembd
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-08-15· cited 22×
• State v. Enebak
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-10-06· cited 20×
• STATE EX REL. JUVENILE DEPT., CLATSOP CTY v. Martin
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1975-04-01· cited 16×
• State v. Gore
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-02-16· cited 14×
• EOP-Nicollet Mall, L.L.C. v. County of Hennepin
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-11-02· cited 10×
• Rohda v. Franklin Life Insurance
  D. Colorado· 1988-05-12· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Swinburne
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1959-05-11· cited 47×
• State v. Olson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1966-05-31· cited 33×
• Ostrowski v. Mockridge
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1954-05-28· cited 25×
• Snyker v. Snyker
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1955-10-14· cited 21×
• Nelson v. Ackermann
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1957-05-24· cited 19×
• Polin v. St. Paul Union Depot Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1924-05-29· cited 11×