State v. Follett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Mitchell requires submission of “serious endangerment” inquiry to the fact-finder, which is the jury in a jury trial and the judge in a bench trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Roger Matthew Walters v. Manfred Maass, Superintendent
  Ninth Circuit· 1995-01-24· cited 169×
• Roger Matthew Walters v. Manfred Maass, Superintendent
  Ninth Circuit· 1993-12-08· cited 24×
• State v. Lovelace
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-01-11· cited 14×
• State v. Mastne
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-05-11· cited 2×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Mitchell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-03-25· cited 15×