State v. Flucas
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 3340
- 117 N.E.3d 834
Syllabus
Inmate appeals his conviction for harassment by bodily substance. Inmate spat upon a corrections officer. The inmate's multiple confessions to the offense were admissible and did not violate the corpus delicti rule. Inmate's conviction was supported by sufficient evidence and the greater weight of the evidence where the state presented overwhelming evidence of guilt.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- alleged error must be both specifically assigned and specifically argued in brief of party asserting error to be considered by appellate court
- alleged error must be both specifically assigned and specifically argued in brief of party asserting error to be considered by appellate court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Piper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.