State v. Floyd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the mere fact that the evidence leading to [a] subsequent charge was first discovered as a result of the original arrest and charge for the initial offense” is insufficient to meet the “same conduct” test
• “ ‘the mere fact that the evidence leading to [a] subsequent charge was first discovered as a result of the original arrest and charge for the initial offense” is insufficient to meet the “same conduct” test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hanna
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-11-14· cited 14×
• Willis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-08-05· cited 8×
• State v. Pelham
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-10-19· cited 2×
• State v. Warren
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-07-10· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hoesley
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-03-11· cited 9×
• Bouchacra v. Leffler
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-04-07· cited 3×