New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 3/12/1991
State v. Florez
Citations
- 248 N.J. Super. 54
- 589 A.2d 1382
- 1991 N.J. Super. LEXIS 136
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- substantial concern over safety of prosecutor's paid, professional informant who set up defendant's drug buy justified refusal to disclose informant's real name and address where other information was known about him and deemed sufficient to permit full cross-examination
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Imbriani
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-03-25· cited 3,599×
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,040×
- Coy v. IowaSupreme Court· 1988-06-29· cited 1,295×
- State v. PonterySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1955-10-17· cited 120×
- State v. TalbotSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1976-08-09· cited 75×
- State v. MilliganSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1976-10-07· cited 62×
- State v. RockholtSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1984-06-27· cited 40×
- State v. OliverSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1967-07-20· cited 40×
- State v. MedinaNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1985-06-11· cited 30×
- State v. CrudupNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1980-10-28· cited 19×
- State v. WilliamsNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-03-23· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.