State v. Flores-Serpas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, under the law of the case, a panel generally will not reconsider issues decided by another panel in a prior appeal in the same case
• explaining that, under the law of the case, a panel generally will not reconsider issues decided by another panel in a prior appeal in the same case
• permitting debtors to amend bankruptcy schedules to claim homestead exemption more than one year after the date of filing
• “A case is not closed simply because a discharge of the debtor has been granted.”
• “A case is not closed simply because a discharge of the debtor has been granted.”
• “Whether the [debtors] could amend their schedules 27 post-petition is separate from the question whether the 28 exemption was allowable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).