State v. Flores

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the “State’s proof need establish only a reasonable inference that the crime charged was actually committed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Barragan-Sierra
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-07-17· cited 23×
• State v. Morgan
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-11-19· cited 22×
• State of Arizona v. Cesar Francisco Rubiano
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-01-18· cited 16×
• State of Arizona v. Carl W. Morgan, Jr
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-11-19· cited 4×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Smith v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1954-12-06· cited 719×
• State v. Cook
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1977-04-25· cited 74×
• State v. Cobelli
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1989-12-27· cited 39×
• State v. Hernandez
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1958-01-21· cited 37×
• State v. Flannigan
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-11-03· cited 30×
• State v. JONES EX REL. COUNTY OF MARICORA
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-06-13· cited 26×
• State v. Hale
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1961-10-06· cited 24×
• State v. Janise
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1977-10-05· cited 20×
• Commonwealth v. DiSabatino
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-10-22· cited 17×
• State v. DeCamp
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-05-27· cited 8×
• State v. Cook
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-05-18· cited 6×
• State v. Villa
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-02-22· cited 6×