State v. Florence
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 4365
Syllabus
The trial court improperly advised appellant that he was subject to a discretionary term of post-release control for \a period of three years\ as opposed to a period of \up to three years\ as required by R.C. 2967.28(C). Given this error, the post-release control portion of appellant's sentence is void. Judgment reversed in part and remanded for the sole purpose of resentencing appellant to the appropriate term of post-release control. In all other respects, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Judges: Welbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court· 2010-12-23· cited 1,066×
- State v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-31· cited 654×
- State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court· 2004-12-01· cited 641×
- State v. BezakOhio Supreme Court· 2007-07-11· cited 453×
- State v. BeasleyOhio Supreme Court· 1984-12-12· cited 332×
- State v. HoldcroftOhio Supreme Court· 2013-11-20· cited 230×
- State v. Grimes (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-05-24· cited 175×
- Romito v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court· 1967-06-07· cited 87×
- State v. EggersOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-07-19· cited 14×
- State v. AdkinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-06-10· cited 11×
- State v. SnellOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-07· cited 3×
- State v. FlorenceOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-02-02· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.