Skip to main content

State v. Florence

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 4365

Syllabus

The trial court improperly advised appellant that he was subject to a discretionary term of post-release control for \a period of three years\ as opposed to a period of \up to three years\ as required by R.C. 2967.28(C). Given this error, the post-release control portion of appellant's sentence is void. Judgment reversed in part and remanded for the sole purpose of resentencing appellant to the appropriate term of post-release control. In all other respects, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Judges: Welbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.