State v. Florczak

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that three-year-old’s hearsay statements were sufficiently reliable to be admissible because the child’s emotional state and behavior while reporting corroborated her out-of-court statements
• holding that although the trial court did not consider the reliability of KT's out-of-court statements, the record sufficiently documented corroborating evideAce of those statements, including KT's emotional state and behavior during her counseling sessions
• observing that psychological treatment falls within definition of medical treatment exception
• observing that psychological treatment falls within definition of medical treatment exception
• failure to object to admissibility of evidence precludes appellate review
• failure to object to admissibility of evidence precludes appellate review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).