State v. Fletcher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a trial court abuses its discretion when it limits argument based on an incorrect understanding of the law
• explaining that, under ORS 163.175 (1)(b), “the state must prove that defendant intentionally or knowingly used a dangerous weapon,” which includes prov- ing intent or knowledge “with regard to the nature of the weapon employed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Higginbotham
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-10-30· cited 6×
• State v. Sanchez-Cacatzun
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-06-17· cited 5×
• State v. Brosy
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-06-28· cited 2×
• State v. Huckabee
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-09-10

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Wyatt
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-12-01· cited 659×
• State v. Williams
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-03-26· cited 125×
• State v. Boyce
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-05-19· cited 22×
• State v. Goodin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1971-12-27· cited 18×
• State v. Bell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-04-05· cited 9×
• State v. Allen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-08-21· cited 4×
• State v. Jackson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-08-29· cited 3×
• State v. Mosley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-05-31· cited 2×
• State v. Hooper
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-04-17· cited 2×