Missouri Court of Appeals· 9/27/1988
State v. Fletcher
Citations
- 758 S.W.2d 476
- 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 1346
- 1988 WL 98990
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming denial of an oral motion for a continuance made “[a]fter the jury was seated”
- affirming denial of an oral motion for a continuance made \[a]fter the jury was seated\
- affirming denial of an oral motion for a continuance made “[a]fter the jury was seated”
- \'Defendant's failure to file the request in writing accompanied by an affidavit showing good cause as required by Rule 24.09 is sufficient ground to affirm the trial court's action.\
- “‘Defendant’s failure to file the request in writing accompanied by an affidavit showing good cause as required by Rule 24.09 is sufficient ground to affirm the trial court’s action.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flanigan, Hogan, Maus, Prewitt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. YowellSupreme Court of Missouri· 1974-07-22· cited 100×
- State v. SimoneSupreme Court of Missouri· 1967-06-12· cited 49×
- State v. OliverSupreme Court of Missouri· 1978-10-10· cited 37×
- State v. McGinnisMissouri Court of Appeals· 1981-09-25· cited 20×
- State v. DiamondMissouri Court of Appeals· 1982-11-23· cited 18×
- State v. CaseyMissouri Court of Appeals· 1984-12-11· cited 13×
- State v. HeistandMissouri Court of Appeals· 1986-07-08· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.