State v. Fleis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the sexual communications, along with Fleis’s communications about the two meeting[s], provide sufficient evidence from which a jury could find beyond a reasonable doubt that Fleis’s purpose in communicating with “Kayla” was to entice her”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).