State v. Flath

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that information that a suspicious person wearing baggy clothes had been seen in a drug-ridden area and that he walked away upon the approach of law enforcement officers did not suffice to support an investigatory detention
• holding that information that a suspicious person wearing baggy clothes had been seen in a drug-ridden area and that he walked away upon the approach of law enforcement officers did not suffice to support an investigatory detention
• holding that information that a suspicious person wearing baggy clothes had been seen in a drug-ridden area and that he walked away upon the approach of law enforcement officers did not suffice to support an investigatory detention
• holding that information that a suspicious person wearing baggy clothes had been seen in a drug- ridden area and that he walked away upon the approach of law enforcement officers did not suffice to support an investigatory detention
• stating that prior to an appeal being filed with an appellate court, the trial court retains jurisdiction to correct clerical errors
• noting the trial court’s violation of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-2605 had “no effect on the juvenile’s adjudication or disposition”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).