State v. Fitzsimmons

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Whether the State in a criminal proceeding may introduce further evidence after a defendant has rested his case is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court, and the exercise of that discretion will rarely be cause for reversal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Peyatt
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1983-12-15· cited 130×
• State v. Pietranton
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1954-11-23· cited 43×
• Adams v. Sparacio
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1973-05-22· cited 25×
• State v. Dietz
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1990-03-08· cited 21×
• State v. Duell
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1985-06-27· cited 19×
• State v. Ward
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1981-12-08· cited 15×
• State Ex Rel. Toryak v. Spagnuolo
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1982-06-23· cited 10×
• State v. Kessinger
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1959-03-10· cited 10×
• State v. Clay
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1977-07-15· cited 4×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Weaver v. Wheeling Traction Co.
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1922-09-26· cited 13×
• State v. Murphy
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1923-04-03· cited 11×
• Perdue v. Caswell Creek Coal & Coke Co.
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1895-04-03· cited 9×