State v. Fischer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• abutting landowners tilled land which was claimed to be subject to a flow-age easement
• acts of ownership and control disprove owner’s intent to dedicate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• CAROGA REALTY COMPANY v. Tapper
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1966-05-20· cited 30×
• Buller v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-06-24· cited 17×
• Corneal v. State Plant Board
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1958-03-21· cited 12×
• Security Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. C & C Investments, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1989-11-21· cited 11×
• Marsh v. Carlson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-07-29· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kiges v. City of St. Paul
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1953-12-31· cited 53×
• City of St. Paul v. Colter
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1866-07-15· cited 36×
• TePoel v. Larson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1952-05-09· cited 30×
• State v. Bentley
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1950-05-19· cited 14×
• Bingenheimer v. Diamond Iron Mining Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1952-07-25· cited 13×
• Hurley v. City of West St. Paul
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1901-06-07· cited 8×
• Jungels v. Schramel
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1924-01-25· cited 5×
• Boye v. City of Albert Lea
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1904-07-22· cited 3×