State v. Fischer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• all available officers on scene taking part in the investigation contributed to a finding of exigency when pressing medical needs also were present
• extensive evidence documentation, including finding and identifying severed limbs, - 26 - \required immediate attention\ sufficient to divert officers from applying for a warrant when the defendant's pressing medical needs necessitated an immediate blood draw

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Schumacher
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-03-03· cited 13×
• State v. Vortherms
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2020-12-02· cited 10×
• State v. Short Bull
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-05-15· cited 5×
• United States v. Manubolu
  First Circuit· 2021-09-14· cited 4×
• Hamen v. Hamlin Cnty.
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-02-10· cited 4×
• State v. Rogers
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2016-11-22· cited 2×
• State v. Grassrope
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2022-02-09· cited 2×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Schmerber v. California
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
• United States v. Jacobsen
  Supreme Court· 1984-04-02· cited 3,218×
• Kentucky v. King
  Supreme Court· 2011-05-16· cited 1,457×
• Walter v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-20· cited 793×
• State v. Fierro
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-08-20· cited 63×
• State v. Hess
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-05-05· cited 60×
• State v. Schwartz
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-11-10· cited 41×
• State v. Smith
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-07-16· cited 17×
• State v. Sorensen
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-09-29· cited 12×
• State v. Running Shield
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2015-10-28· cited 4×