State v. Fips

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that letter assuring employee of FMLA leave after his elective surgery was complete was not a misrepresentation on which he could have detrimentally relied
• finding that the plaintiff employee could not have relied on any representation of his employer that he was eligible for FMLA leave, because his shoulder surgery, for which he sought such leave, was complete when he received the letter containing the purported misrepresentation
• also holding that employee could not show that he detrimentally relied when he had scheduled surgery before he received letter
• “Under the FMLA, twelve weeks of leave is both the minimum the employer must provide and the maximum that the statute requires.”
• also holding that employee could not show that he detrimentally relied when he had scheduled surgery before he received letter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).