Skip to main content

State v. Finch

Citations

  • 398 S.W.3d 928
  • 2013 WL 2190154
  • 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 627

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that the analytical steps set out in Houston v. Crider , 317 S.W.3d 178 , 187 (Mo. App. S.D. 2010) are applicable to a sufficiency of the evidence challenge in the criminal context
  • discussing three analytical steps required to challenge sufficiency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burrell, Scott, Sheffield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.