State v. Figueroa-Olguin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the defendant’s conviction of impeding traffic where he was driving between eighteen and twenty-eight miles per hour below the posted maximum speed limit in a no-passing zone and approximately eighteen-to-twenty automobiles where backed-up behind the defendant
• valid stop for impeding traffic when defendant traveling 17 m.p.h. in 35 m.p.h. no-passing zone and 17-20 vehicles backed up behind defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).