Skip to main content
· 12/28/2005

State v. Figgures

Citations

  • 839 N.E.2d 772
  • 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 2441
  • 2005 WL 3536334

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting “immediately apparent” test does not mean that officer must “know” that item is contraband but only that he have probable cause to believe so; a “‘practical, nontechnical’ probability that incriminating evidence is involved is all that is required.”
  • noting the “immediately apparent” prong does not mean that the officer must “know” that an item is contraband but only that he have probable cause to believe so; a “‘practical, nontechnical’ probability that incriminating evidence is involved is all that is required.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Darden, Sharpnack, Bailey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.