State v. Field

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the defendant “was never outside the presence of the police from the time that he was first advised of his Miranda rights until the time of his arrest”
• stating the test for when a defendant must be readvised of his rights
• “[UJnder federal law, we must consider the totality of the circumstances to determine whether successive interrogations require a suspect to be re-advised of his Miranda rights [.] ”
• police not required to readminister Miranda warnings on the second day of questioning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hudson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-11-07· cited 12×
• State v. Ward
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-01-09· cited 5×
• State v. Alarcon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-11-20· cited 5×
• Field v. Coursey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-08-13· cited 4×
• State v. Codon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-11-09· cited 4×
• State v. Hurtado-Navarrete
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-09-11· cited 2×