State v. Fickert
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 4349
Syllabus
The trial court erred in granting Appellant's motion to suppress evidence obtained during a traffic stop. Specifically, the trial court incorrectly concluded that the traffic stop was unlawful where the court did not discredit the investigating officer's testimony and the officer's testimony was sufficient to establish a reasonable, articulable suspicion that Appellant committed a traffic violation. Judgment reversed and remanded for further proceedings. (Froelich, J., dissenting.)
Judges: Welbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- State v. AndrewsOhio Supreme Court· 1991-01-23· cited 948×
- Heien v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 2014-12-15· cited 619×
- State v. MaysOhio Supreme Court· 2008-09-16· cited 383×
- State v. RastbichlerOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-02-21· cited 28×
- State v. PenceOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-14· cited 9×
- State v. DeaceyOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-10-06· cited 9×
- State v. DowtyOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-30· cited 4×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-08· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.