Arizona Supreme Court· 10/19/1978
State v. Ferguson
Citations
- 586 P.2d 190
- 120 Ariz. 345
- 1978 Ariz. LEXIS 283
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- after jury was impaneled, trial court dismissed jury for 14 days because prosecutor was trying another case
- after jury was impaneled, trial court dismissed jury for 14 days because prosecutor was trying another case
- “[t]he exigencies” of in-custody defendant’s escape from courthouse was admissible to show his motive for committing armed robberies in a parking lot
- “The pimpose of Rule 8 is to insure that a criminal defendant is not forgotten while the orderly administration of justice swirls around him on all sides but leaving him untouched.”
- “The purpose of Rule 8 is to insure that a criminal defendant is not forgotten while the orderly administration of justice swirls around him on all sides but leaving him untouched.”
- “the law is primarily concerned that the identification process be reliable”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hays, Cameron, Struckmeyer, Holohan, Gordon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. RossiArizona Supreme Court· 1985-09-24· cited 57×
- State v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court· 1989-02-09· cited 54×
- State v. LibbertonArizona Supreme Court· 1984-04-23· cited 53×
- State v. MeekerArizona Supreme Court· 1984-12-21· cited 51×
- State v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court· 1979-04-04· cited 37×
- State v. MendozaArizona Supreme Court· 1992-01-07· cited 26×
- State v. WatsonWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1980-04-04· cited 25×
- State v. AragonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-05-26· cited 19×
- State v. SelfCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-02-03· cited 16×
- State v. TrujilloArizona Supreme Court· 1978-11-07· cited 11×
- State v. BrokawCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-04-02· cited 10×
- State v. GamezArizona Supreme Court· 1985-02-21· cited 9×
- State ex rel. Romley v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court· 1989-10-31· cited 5×
- State of Arizona v. Phillip Jaime AragonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-05-26
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.