State v. Feregrino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the record was inadequate to determine “whether Fere-grino was actually prejudiced by his counsel’s failure to obtain a jury-trial waiver that complied with the rule”
• explaining that “ordinarily . . . where an argument that the Iowa Constitution should be construed differently than the United States Constitution is not presented, we assume for the purposes of the case that the provisions should be interpreted in an identical fashion”
• presuming prejudice prong of ineffective-assistance claims when there is a structural defect
• discussing structural defects and occasions of presumed prejudice in ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims
• “The doctrine of stare decisis counsels caution before we overturn prior precedent of this court.”
• “The doctrine of stare decisis counsels caution before we overturn prior precedent of this court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).