State v. Fee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding in DWI case that defense of competing harms was unavailable where threatened harm was only speculative and uncertain
• defendant not entitled to competing harms defense because he had legal alternatives to driving to his pharmacy under the influence of alcohol to investigate a burglar alarm
• competing harms defense, driving under the influence charge
• applying the statutory defense of necessity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rios
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1999-03-22· cited 22×
• Hoagland v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2010-10-07· cited 20×
• State v. O'Brien
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1989-12-29· cited 17×
• State v. Nelson
  Montana Supreme Court· 2001-12-03· cited 8×
• State v. Riedl
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1991-03-15· cited 8×
• State v. Daoud
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1996-06-27· cited 8×
• Jones v. City of Tulsa
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1993-07-27· cited 6×
• State v. Bernard
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1996-07-24· cited 4×
• State v. Williams
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-08-07· cited 2×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Hood
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1983-07-05· cited 78×
• State v. Dorsey
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1978-12-06· cited 49×
• State v. Warshow
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1979-12-21· cited 42×