Ohio Court of Appeals· 6/26/2017

State v. Featherston

Citations

2017 Ohio 5487

Syllabus

Appellant's three convictions for receiving stolen property are not allied offenses of similar import the trial court did not abuse its discretion by not removing Appellant's appointed attorney any admission of hearsay statements was harmless and the convictions of Appellant were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Judges: Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

State v. Lane
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-06-01

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Thompkins
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
State v. Ruff
Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-03-25· cited 912×
State v. Jones
Ohio Supreme Court· 2001-04-18· cited 492×
State v. Morris
Ohio Supreme Court· 2012-06-05· cited 478×
State v. Cowans
Ohio Supreme Court· 1999-10-20· cited 323×
Middendorf v. Middendorf
Ohio Supreme Court· 1998-07-29· cited 277×
United States v. Robert E. Iles, Sr.
Sixth Circuit· 1990-11-27· cited 190×
State v. Deal
Ohio Supreme Court· 1969-02-11· cited 166×
State v. Richcreek
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-09-16· cited 53×
Morrow v. Becker
Ohio Supreme Court· 2013-10-16· cited 52×
State v. Potts
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-29· cited 35×
State v. Stall
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-11-07· cited 28×
State v. Brown
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-03-28· cited 28×
State v. Skapik
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-23· cited 20×
State v. Vanausdal
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-11-14· cited 9×
State v. Beadle
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-23· cited 2×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.