State v. Fay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[s]ubstantial compliance with the requirements of section 941.45(3) is sufficient to invoke the benefits of the IAD”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Walton
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2007-05-31· cited 348×
• State of Tennessee v. Michael Shane Springer
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 2013-06-24· cited 47×
• Dozier v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-08-21· cited 3×
• Dawes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-02-28· cited 2×
• Parks v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-09-03
• Attorney General Opinion No.
  Kansas Attorney General Reports· 2004-11-16
• Hunter, III v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-08-01

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Torres-Arboledo v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-03-24· cited 137×
• State Ex Rel. Saxton v. Moore
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1980-04-07· cited 35×
• Escalanti v. Superior Court
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-03-06· cited 33×
• Stephen Scott Crooker v. United States
  First Circuit· 1987-03-26· cited 29×
• United States v. Loren Robbie Wilson
  Tenth Circuit· 1983-10-21· cited 26×
• Felix v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-04-28· cited 24×
• United States v. Alvin Glenn Taylor
  Sixth Circuit· 1999-04-01· cited 22×
• Runck v. State
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1993-02-23· cited 17×
• Coit v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-10-06· cited 16×
• State v. Roberts
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-03-04· cited 13×
• People v. Helmstetter
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1995-08-24· cited 9×
• State v. Culligan
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-08-08· cited 5×
• People v. Gabbidon
  New York Supreme Court· 1982-10-21· cited 3×