Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 11/28/1995
State v. Farrow
Citations
- 140 N.H. 473
- 667 A.2d 1029
- 1995 N.H. LEXIS 174
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that statutes pertaining to the same subject matter \are to be considered in interpreting\ one another and will be construed \so that they do not contradict each other\ (quotations omitted)
- stating that statutes pertaining to the same subject matter “are to be considered in interpreting” one another and will be construed “so that they do not contradict each other” (quotations omitted)
- “This court will avoid construing statutes in a manner that would produce an unjust and seemingly illogical result.” (quotation omitted)
- statutes which deal with a similar subject matter are to be construed so as not to contradict each other
- this court examines specific statutes “not in isolation, but in the context of the overall statutory scheme”
- “We begin our analysis by examining the [statute’s] purpose and effect . . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Batchelder, Broderick, Johnson, Rsa, Who
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Milford Lumber Co. v. RCB Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2001-09-28· cited 28×
- Fischer v. HooperSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1999-06-16· cited 27×
- Bohan v. RitzoSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1996-07-19· cited 24×
- Appeal of RowanSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1997-06-05· cited 22×
- State v. DixonSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1999-11-02· cited 22×
- Nault v. N & L Development Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2001-02-12· cited 20×
- Pheasant Lane Realty Trust v. City of NashuaSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1998-11-09· cited 19×
- Associated Press v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2005-12-30· cited 19×
- Cheever v. Southern New Hampshire Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1997-01-28· cited 18×
- Appeal of Ashland Electric DepartmentSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1996-09-25· cited 17×
- Petition of HoytSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1999-04-21· cited 16×
- Unit Owners Ass'n of Summit Vista Lot 8 Condominium v. MillerSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1996-05-16· cited 15×
- Milette v. New Hampshire Retirement SystemSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1996-09-30· cited 14×
- Lord v. LovettSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2001-04-04· cited 13×
- State v. GiffordSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2002-08-16· cited 11×
- State of New Hampshire v. Kurt CarpentinoSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2014-01-14· cited 10×
- State v. MoranSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2009-01-29· cited 9×
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1997-06-05· cited 9×
- State v. SullivanSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1999-12-28· cited 8×
- State v. RosarioSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2002-11-04· cited 8×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. FarrowSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1978-04-28· cited 45×
- In re Public Service Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1988-01-26· cited 45×
- State v. BellSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1984-08-13· cited 22×
- State v. DeanSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1975-09-30· cited 21×
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1992-05-06· cited 18×
- State v. HarperSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-07-26· cited 16×
- State v. WoodsSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1995-02-03· cited 16×
- Appeal of Derry Education Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1993-12-17· cited 15×
- Barksdale v. Town of EpsomSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1992-12-23· cited 14×
- State v. ROGER M.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1981-01-28· cited 11×
- Quality Carpets, Inc. v. CarterSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1991-03-08· cited 10×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1979-08-20· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.