Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 6/29/1998
State v. Farrow
Citations
- 504 S.E.2d 131
- 332 S.C. 190
- 1998 S.C. App. LEXIS 95
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing admissibility of reply testimony offered in \rebuttal of matters raised in defense\ and placing admission of reply testimony within the sound discretion of the trial court
- the admission of reply testimony is within the sound discretion of the trial judge
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howell, Cureton, Goolsby
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- JKT Co., Inc. v. HardwickSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-02-27· cited 48×
- State v. HumpherySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-02-05· cited 15×
- Day v. KilgoreSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-05-23· cited 10×
- Sullivan v. DavisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-01-30· cited 9×
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-11-03· cited 6×
- Unnamed caseFourth Circuit· 1985-01-16· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.