Ohio Court of Appeals· 10/7/2022
State v. Farris
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 3584
Syllabus
Judgment affirmed where trial court did not abuse its discretion in relying on out-of-court statements and an unauthenticated record of a Michigan extradition proceeding, as evidence not clearly hearsay and Evid.R. 101(C) excepts application of rules of evidence in community control proceedings.
Judges: Zmuda
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
- State v. TaltyOhio Supreme Court· 2004-09-29· cited 173×
- State v. Heinz (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-05-05· cited 82×
- State v. Jackson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-12-15· cited 50×
- State v. NewsomeOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-08-31· cited 13×
- State v. FarrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-01-17· cited 2×
- State v. IronsOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-24· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.